It is widely argued that every type of promotion should be prohibited owing to its impractical intention and even detrimental effect on society as opposed to others who believe that marketing still brings in some good outcomes. In the following paragraphs, I will discuss both positions before declaring a personal stance.

To begin with, it is unquestionable that some kinds of commercial might not be beneficial and probably provoke unnecessary losses to the community. These adverts tend to cause controversies among members of the society as well as unwanted violence in some cases. For instance, there are a number of sexist adverts which encourage some male members to treat women with disrespect and contempt. Not only do these adverts raise scorching issues about female discrimination, they also lead to the increase in domestic aggression.

Despite the aforementioned points, my personal perspective is that society can achieve many gains from marketing provided that the contents are thoroughly considered before publicizing. First and foremost, there are adverts which send profound and meaningful messages to society such as British’s Christmas marketing. In spite of the main purpose of these adverts being to promote Christmas products, they also convey significant ideas which are sharing love towards others. Secondly, conservative organizations often appear on publicity. Their focus is raising awareness of people about endangered species and warning of natural habitat destruction leading to detrimental effects on the environment. This results in less harmful substances emitted to the environment caused by industry companies due to protests made by members of society with the aim to protect animals and their living habitat.

To conclude, my view is many kinds of marketing can be completely profitable for society if only the content of these adverts is carefully deliberated before publicizing.

The world in which we are living today is increasingly dominated by the overwhelming power of advertising. Some people believe that commercials do not serve any beneficial purposes and even spoil the society. However, I totally disagree with the idea that imposing a ban on all advertising forms can benefit the society.

On the one hand, there are some sorts of harmful advertising which should be prohibited. Nowadays, under the pressure of competitiveness in the market, companies may have to expend great efforts to promote their products or services via impressive advertisements to attract the attention of consumers and become superior to their rivals. Therefore, a number of firms tend to make use of advertisements which contain sensitive content that is not culturally appropriate, involve violent or sexual issues. If these types of advertisements become ubiquitous, it may exert/have negative impacts on the general public. For instance, a violence-related commercial shown on TV might encourage teenagers to behave in the same way which then leads to an increase in juvenile delinquency. Thus, I believe that it is crucial to ban/prevent advertisements which may exert adverse/undesirable effects on society.

On the other hand, I would argue that imposing a ban on every form of advertisement would not benefit the society. This is due to the fact that advertising offers not only producers but also consumers a variety of benefits. Firstly, advertising is an effective method of promotion which helps producers attract a large number of potential customers and increase both their sales and their enviable reputation via interesting commercials. Secondly, advertising supplies consumers with a wealth of information which enables them to compare the price and quality of various products from different producers before making decisions. Therefore, if all forms of advertising are prohibited, all those benefits may be eradicated. Furthermore, it would create various negative impacts such as an asymmetry of information, a decrease in the number of choices in terms of consumers and a reduction in revenue regarding producers/manufactures and the low development of the economy.

In conclusion, I hold the point of view/perception that prohibiting all forms of advertising will cause more serious damages to the society than benefit them. Thus, the Government should impose a ban on harmful types of advertisements instead of every form.

Today, it comes as no surprise that advertisements can be seen everywhere, from banners being hung up on the street to advertising video on the Internet. Most of them are very irritating and sometimes detrimental too. However, I suppose that we just need to prohibit and regulate more strictly some kinds of advertising but not all of them.

There is no denying the fact that there are more and more fiddling advertisements printed outstandingly on newspaper or distributed by hand. The development of information technology makes the availability of such advertisement viral. Some of them, especially those with violent or sexy imagery, can be harmful to the growth of children in terms of physics and mentality. Furthermore, the majority of advertisements tend to exaggerate the quality of products and overlook their drawbacks. For instance, attractive videos about a kind of spicy snack or fast food can easily increase people’s appetite and make them skip the main meals which are far more healthy.

However, only by creating enchanting forms of advertising can we encourage consumers ‘purchase, boost company’s revenue and eventually lead to economic development. Moreover, formal advertisements, particularly from prestige labels, might partly direct customers to which products they are more appropriate with. Then, they can make a good choice on their own.

Therefore, competent authorities should take immediate measures to control the numbers as well as the content of each advertisement to ensure that they represent the true quality level of product and customers are not deceived. To wrap up, I am in favour of limitation and enacting stringent regulations to advertisements instead of banning all kind of them.

It has been argued that a complete restriction on all forms of advertising would be of great value for society as a whole, due to its apparent lack of usefulness and sometimes harmfulness. In my opinion, this assumption is highly subjective, and therefore I completely disagree with it.

To begin with, to claim that commercials have no use and are detrimental to consumers is completely ill-founded. We are living in a world where new products with distinct and revolutionary features to better our lives and solve everyday problems are being released almost every day. We cannot deny the fact that such products would remain relatively unknown unless advertising was used to reach customers on a large scale. As a result of advertising, many businesses will thrive, and in turn, pay taxes to the government which will help contribute towards a variety of governmental systems, such as education, healthcare and social security. Such systems help to ensure the well-being of all citizens.

From another perspective, dependency on the advertising industry is inevitable for any nation to prosper. Once commercials, by law, undergo a prohibitive order, unemployment rates would increase and the burden would fall on the state. For example, Coca Cola dispenses thousands of employment opportunities in advertising throughout its branches across different regions around the world. If adverts are forbidden, an unthinkable number of workers, such as marketers, would either be driven to other jobs or become unemployed. The government, as a result, have to provide temporary financial support for those people. In other words, banning all forms of advertising would have many undesirable implications on society.

In conclusion, it is unreasonable to presume that advertisements are irrelevant and need to be prohibited for the sake of societies best interests.